Trust vs Company: The Best Way to Hold Kenyan Property as a Foreign Investor

MUKAMBA & COMPANY ADVOCATES

West Park Towers, Mpesi Lane, Westlands, Nairobi | info@mukambalaw.com | mukambalaw.com

Two very different tools, solving two very different problems — and one restriction that applies to both

31 August 2026 | By Eugene Mukamba, Advocate

Foreign investors weighing how to hold Kenyan property tend to assume the choice between a trust and a company is about tax, or prestige, or what their lawyer back home is used to.

It is usually none of those — it is about what you actually intend to do with the property.

The Restriction That Applies to Both, Equally

Neither structure lets you escape Article 65 of the Constitution. A company is treated as a Kenyan citizen, capable of holding freehold land, only if it is wholly owned by Kenyan citizens — a single foreign shareholder is enough to make it a non-citizen company for land purposes.

A trust is treated the same way: only where the entire beneficial interest is held by citizens does it escape the leasehold ceiling.

A foreign-owned company and a foreign-benefiting trust both sit under the same 99-year leasehold cap. Neither is a shortcut around the other.

Where a Company Is Clearly the Better Tool

  • You intend to actively operate a business on the property — hospitality, manufacturing, agriculture for commercial sale — rather than simply hold it.
  • You have multiple investors and want the limited liability protection and clear share-transfer mechanics the Companies Act, 2015 provides.
  • You expect to raise further investment, bring in partners, or eventually sell the operating business rather than the underlying land itself.
  • You need the property to generate active trading income — a registered family trust structure is explicitly not meant to be used for trading.
The trading restriction that rules trusts out for active business

A registered family trust in Kenya is built for holding and managing assets for beneficiaries — not for running a business. Where a business needs to operate on the land, the property is generally better held or leased by a company, with a trust, if used at all, sitting above it for succession planning rather than day-to-day operations.

Where a Trust Is Clearly the Better Tool

  • The property is being held for the long-term benefit of a family, not for active commercial trading.
  • Your priority is a clean succession plan — avoiding your leasehold interest getting caught in cross-border probate on death.
  • You want governance and decision-making rules for multiple family beneficiaries that a company’s shareholder structure is not designed to express as flexibly.

The Combination That Often Works Best

For foreign investors running an active business on Kenyan land, the practical structure is often a Kenyan-registered company that holds the leasehold interest and operates the business, with its shares ultimately held by a trust for succession purposes.

That combination lets each tool do the job it is actually built for — the company for operations and liability, the trust for continuity — without asking either one to do something Kenyan law does not permit it to do.

Talk to an Advocate

This article is general information, not legal advice for your specific situation. Every case turns on its own facts and evidence.

Book a free 20-minute consultation: +254 706 223 157 / +254 797 450 653 | info@mukambalaw.com | West Park Towers, Mpesi Lane, Westlands, Nairobi